The days of deriding thefor its , and overreliance on Thunderbolt/USB-C connections are over thanks to Apple’s most recent updates. They brought us devices with new processors, a top-notch (pun intended) design, mini-LED backlit displays, plus added back the ports we’ve missed and removed the Touch Bar.
But the fact remains that there’s a far bigger variety of designs, feature sets and display choices for Windows laptops and Chromebooks, andremains the preferred platform for playing games locally. lets Macs circumvent the gaming problem to a certain extent, but not completely; only a fraction of the universe of games is playable via the cloud.
Ancan stretch the limits of your budget, and those who’ve set aside a nice chunk of cash might want something a little more customizable. No one can deny that one appealing thing about is the variety. Even when trying to imitate the offerings of a MacBook (or an ) there are all sizes of far less expensive , as well as 14- and 15-inch laptops that are slightly smaller and lighter than the 16-inch MacBook Pro, but not quite as small as the , across the price spectrum. You can also get more variety, with alternatives like . Plus, we’re seeing lots of .
You may want to wait a bit to buy a Windows model, though. AtIntel rolled out based on its Alder Lake architecture; like the Apple M1 chips it splits the cores into performance-oriented and efficiency-oriented, which seems to improve overall performance. Intel also split the high-performance CPU line into its traditional H series, which is now more gaming focused, and a new P series for nongaming high performance, which you’ll be seeing in most of these types of laptops going forward. We haven’t yet tested any of the P-series laptops yet.
This list is periodically updated with new models we’ve tested and reviewed. It’s a great place to start to get an idea of what’s available. If you need advice on whether a particular type of laptop or two-in-one is right for you, jump to our laptop FAQ at the bottom of the list.
So when want to go Windows, here are our recommendations for laptops to fill that MacBook-size void in your life.
For a lot less than an entry-level MacBook Pro 13, The HP Envy x360 13 makes a great pick for an older high school or college student — or anyone looking for a small, stylish and easy-to-travel-with two-in-one. It’s light at just less than 3 pounds (1.3 kg) and battery life is long despite the size. It’s also available with a choice of AMD Ryzen 5 4500U or Intel 11th-gen Core processors.
Read our HP Envy x360 13 (2020) review.
A slightly updated and renamed version of the Yoga C940, the Yoga 9i is just a little bigger than a 13-inch MacBook Pro, fast, attractive and feature-packed. Plus it gives you something you can’t get in a MacBook: the 360-degree screen that lets you use it like a tablet or prop it up in a tent or kiosk configuration.
Read our Lenovo Yoga 9i review.
If, like me, you’re not a fan of OLED screens for photo editing — they’re not optimized for Adobe RGB and aren’t great at tonal range in the shadows — then what you need is a laptop with a good IPS display. The Dell XPS 17 9700 with the 4K screen option delivers that, and it’s not as reflective as the OLED screens I’ve seen. Dell’s PremierColor software isn’t perfect, but it gives you more control over screen settings than most I’ve seen, and it has two Thunderbolt 3 controllers to make your external drives happy. It’s heavier than the MacBook, but not much bigger, especially given its larger 17-inch screen. And while its battery life isn’t terrific, its performance can certainly keep up. The XPS 17 has been refreshed since this review, and just started shipping; the older model starts at $1,940, while the 9710 starts at $1,568. The starting price differential is because there’s no integrated graphics option for the newer model.
The Razer Blade 17 is a strong runner-up here if you’re willing to trade higher performance and a similar design for a bigger, heavier model. We haven’t yet tested the refreshed 2021 version of the Blade 17 (formerly the Blade Pro 17) starting at $2,400, but there’s nothing that should have changed our high opinion of it: It received faster components and better screen options; one lone older model remains on sale for $2,900. While I recommend getting this Blade 17 laptop with its 4K resolution display option for creators, I’m a big fan of the newly ubiquitous 165Hz 1440p laptop screens, and that resolution is a great match for the screen size without the 4K overkill.
And a great lower-cost alternative is the Dell Inspiron 16 Plus, which doesn’t head to the front of the line primarily because of its lower build quality, and I’m assuming that if you’re looking for a MacBook Pro equivalent you want the metal chassis, better screen and higher-end components. But if you also want to save as much as $1,000, it’s worth considering.
Read our Dell XPS 17 9700 review.
Cheaper than even the MacBook Air, with roughly the same footprint but lighter. The 14-inch Flex 5 has the flexibility of a two-in-one if everything you do is cloud-based. Its sleek look and feel at a Chrome OS price make it a cost-effective alternative.
Read our Lenovo Chromebook Flex 5 review.
If you’re drawn to a MacBook Pro for its featureless-slab aesthetic, Razer’s your Windows go-to. If you want one that roughly matches the 14-inch Pro for design, size and weight, the Blade 14 is your option; its little brother, the Razer Book 13 makes a great alternative to the 13-inch MacBook Pro when you want something a bit smaller and less expensive.
A smaller version than the 15-inch staple, the 14-inch Razer Blade delivers a lot of gaming power for its size without feeling small — an important consideration for a gaming laptop, and one that Apple doesn’t need to worry about — but has decent battery life, a nice size for travel and a subtle design (for a gaming laptop) that’s buttoned-up enough for sitting in a meeting with the top brass or clients.
Read Razer Blade 14 (2021) review.
Dell’s XPS 13 is a 13.3-inch laptop that’s so trimmed up that the body is basically the size of an older 11.6-inch laptop. Being part of the company’s XPS line means both its chassis and components are top-notch for its class, so you’re getting great battery life and performance, too. Power delivery is via USB-C and it comes with a microSD reader and headphone jack. It comes in both a standard clamshell as well as the two-in-one, but I prefer the two-in-one because you can fold it up into a tablet if you have to work in a cramped space.
Read our Dell XPS 2-in-1 review.
What’s better than the Touch Bar? An entire half-screen second display, that’s what. The Duo’s tilt-up second screen can act as an ancillary display, an extension of the primary display (for viewing those long web pages) or a separate control center from which you can run Asus’ custom utilities or as control surfaces for select creative applications. Plus, Asus excels at squeezing every bit of performance out of its high-end laptops, and the 14-inch delivers great battery life, as well.
It comes in two models, 15-inch and the 2021 14-inch Duo 14 that we reviewed. The Duo 14 has either 11th-gen Core i5 or i7 processors, optional Nvidia MX450 discrete graphics and up to 32GB of memory.
Read our Asus ZenBook Duo review.
Windows laptop vs. MacBook Pro FAQs
Which is faster, a MacBook or a Windows laptop?
That’s an almost impossible question to answer.
For one thing, it’s a moving target. We’re anticipating Intel’s announcement of its mobile(12th-gen) CPUs, the ones with the same hybrid core architecture as the same way as Apple’s M1 chips, as well as new mobile GPU announcements. Both usually come during CES, which is less than a month away, and this go-round Intel may finally reveal its Intel Arc discrete graphics.
And thus far, Apple hasn’t even launched an M1 MacBook with a discrete GPU, thoughto compete with current low-end Nvidia and AMD graphics up to about the RTX 3070 and Radeon RX 6800M, and though neither is really surprising. But it means that at the high end we’re still in sort of a MacBook holding pattern when it comes to comparisons with heavier Windows options.
Plus, differences in operating systems complicate things. Mac OS has long been more efficient than Windows and that’s only improved now that Apple owns its entire food chain. But it doesn’t need to worry about compatibility with partner systems and myriad different components. Then toss in difficulties getting repeatable, comparable, representative and broad-based benchmark results for cross-platform comparisons… well, I don’t feel like going down that rabbit hole right now.
Is a MacBook Pro better for content creation than a Windows laptop?
Once again, a difficult question to answer because there’s no sweeping generalizations you can make. If you’re basing the concern on Windows’ old reputation for being inferior for graphics work, it was accurate at the time but is no longer true.
Screens on Windows laptops have come a long way, and convertibles (aka two-in-ones) mean you can paint or sketch directly on the laptop screen. With a MacBook you’d need to buy an iPad as well.
Some graphics applications are only available on one platform or the other, so figuring out which ones you need and which you can switch away from is the first thing to decide before you choose between Windows and MacOS. Also consider that MacOS no longer supports 32-bit applications, so if you’ve got an old favorite that hasn’t been updated — this happens most with small utilities — but still exists on Windows, that’s something to think about.
Some applications may also be better optimized for one platform than the other, or rely on a specific GPU from AMD or Nvidia for their best acceleration. Since you can’t really use an Nvidia card with a Mac and none of the M1 MacBooks incorporate any discrete graphics, Windows is probably a better bet, especially for programs that rely on Nvidia’s CUDA programming interface. Think about any accessories you need, as well — the drivers and utilities you need to use them may not be available or be stripped down on one or the other.
MacBooks may run faster than equivalently configured Windows laptops simply because MacOS is a lot more tightly integrated with the hardware than Windows can ever be on its side of the fence. Microsoft simply has to support a much wider variety of hardware than Apple will ever need to, and that adds performance overhead; this can be especially important for activities sensitive to latency, like audio recording. Windows’ flexibility is both its strength and its weakness.